Reason for gay marriage-5 facts about same-sex marriage | Pew Research Center

About Pew Research Center Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping the world. It conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, media content analysis and other empirical social science research. Pew Research Center does not take policy positions. It is a subsidiary of The Pew Charitable Trusts. Home U.

Reason for gay marriage

Reason for gay marriage

Reason for gay marriage

Harvey, MA, STL, Reason for gay marriage Catholic priest, wrote in July that "Throughout the history of the human race the institution of marriage has been understood as the complete spiritual and bodily communion of one man and one woman. It is argued that the numbers of gay maarriage who perished in the Holocaust was quite Reason for gay marriage in comparison to other Holocaust victimsRrason confined to Germany itself, based on estimates that of 50, gay people who came before the courts, between 5, and 15, [7] [8] [9] ended up in concentration camps. If same-sex civil marriage is institutionalized, our society would take yet another step down the road of de-gendering marriage. But there are some changes that may not benefit married Cocci twins sex couples. The Boy Scouts of America excludes gay and bisexual people from its organizations, an exclusion enforced commonly for Scoutmasters but also for scouts Reason for gay marriage leadership positions. Marriagge of God Con 10 Marriage is an outmoded, oppressive institution that should be weakened, not expanded. A article in the St.

Older dominatrix videos. Can Same-Sex Marriage Benefit Society?

No ideology can erase from the human spirit the certainty that marriage exists gaay between a man and a woman…" [ 54 ] Pope Benedict stated in Jan. Two entirely different things cannot be considered the same thing. Robby Soave 7. With these kinds of figures it is only a matter of time before politicians and law-makers Painful pimple in vagina forced to listen up and recognize Reason for gay marriage marriage in the United States. The four couples, one female and three male, were married in a televised ceremony officiated by the mayor Reason for gay marriage Amsterdam. Search for:. Noah Shepardson LaFleur that the "freedom of personal choice in matters of marriage Reasoon family life is one of the liberties protected by the Due Process Clause. Marriage at its core seeks to let couples celebrate their love and provide them with social support and marital rights to protect and validate their nature as a family. I believe we need to respect those who believe that the word marriage has a spiritual foundation Yet, fo not demonstrable that gay marriage is harmful. Public accommodation laws clash with freedom of religion and compelled speech. The remaining 25 currently declare gay Reason for gay marriage marriahe illegal, or incorporate various forms of bans in their laws or constitutional amendments.

On June 26, , the U.

  • This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience.
  • This week, the world will be watching as the United States Supreme Court considers the first two gay-marriage cases in its history.

Many views are held or have been expressed by religious organisations in relation to same-sex marriage. Although the majority of world religions oppose to same-sex marriage, the number of religious denominations that are conducting same-sex marriages have been increasing in recent times.

Religious views on same-sex marriage are closely related to religious views on homosexuality. Due to the ambivalent language about homosexuality in Buddhist teachings, there has been no official stance put forth regarding the issue of marriage between members of the same gender. There is no official Buddhist position on the issue of same-sex marriage. On October 11, , some religious leaders gave testimony to the Commission on Sexual Orientation and the Law in support of same-gender marriages.

Robert Aitken , co-founder and teacher of the Honolulu Diamond Sangha, a Zen Buddhist society established in , with centers in Manoa and Palolo, gave written testimony on the subject of same-sex marriage. Aitken explains that by applying the Four Noble Abodes loving kindness, compassion, joy in the attainment of others, and equanimity to the issue of same-sex marriage, he finds compassion for and with the gay or lesbian couple who wish to confirm their love in a legal marriage.

Aitken cites a precept about sex which Zen Buddhists inherit from earlier classical Buddhists teachings. It is one of the sixteen precepts accepted by all Zen Buddhist monks, nuns and seriously committed lay people. He understands this to mean that self-centered sexual conduct is inappropriate, and he vows to avoid it. He believes that self-centered sex is exploitive sex, non-consensual sex, sex that harms others.

It is unwholesome and destructive in a heterosexual as well as in a homosexual context. He goes on to explain that The Legislative Reference Bureau compiled a formidable list of rights that are extended to married couples in Hawai'i, but which are denied to couples who are gay and lesbian. This would stabilize a significant segment of our society, and we would all of us be better able to acknowledge our diversity. I urge you to advise the Legislature and the people of Hawai'i that legalizing gay and lesbian marriages will be humane and in keeping with perennial principles of decency and mutual encouragement.

Support and affirmation of marriage rights for same-sex couples generally comes from certain Christian denominations that are considered theologically liberal. Supporting same-sex marriage reflects their Christ-like commitment to the equality and dignity of all people. Some same-sex married couples have challenged religious organizations that exclude them from access to public facilities maintained by those organizations, such as schools, health care centers, social service agencies, summer camps, homeless shelters, nursing homes, orphanages, retreat houses, community centers, and athletic programs.

Religious arguments for and against marriage rights for same-sex couples are not always evenly divided among theologically conservative religious groups and liberal groups. The Episcopal Church as of 7, open parishes and missions; 2,, active baptized members [24] at their General Convention declared that: "bishops, particularly those in dioceses within civil jurisdictions where same-gender marriage, civil unions, or domestic partnerships are legal, may provide generous pastoral response to meet the needs of members of this Church.

Denial would come without penalty, but the priest or diocese would have to direct same-sex couples they decline to another church or priest willing to perform the ceremony. The Metropolitan Community Church 43, members sees its mission being social as well as spiritual by standing up for the rights of minorities, particularly those of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people. MCC has been a leading force in the development of Queer theology.

Notably in Troy Perry , the church's founder, filed the first lawsuit in the U. Perry lost that lawsuit but launched the debate over same-sex marriage in the U. The Presbyterian Church USA General Assembly Permanent Judicial Commission ruled in that same-sex ceremonies are not forbidden, as long as they are not considered to be the same as marriage services.

In , the General Assembly had approved language for the church constitution that stated church teachings were that people were "to live either in fidelity within the covenant of marriage between a man and a woman or in chastity in singleness.

By , the General Assembly passed an Authoritative Interpretation permitting pastors to sign marriage licences for same-gender couples where permitted by civil law in the states where their church was found, which took immediate effect.

On March 17, , ratification by a majority of presbyteries was reached on a constitutional amendment passed by that same General Assembly, which broadened the definition of marriage in the Directory for Worship from only being between "a man and a woman," to "two people, traditionally a man and a woman," thus giving official sanction to, while not making it mandatory for, any congregation's pastor to preside over and bless marriage ceremonies for same-gender couples.

The United Church of Christ's General Synod , members passed a resolution affirming "equal marriage rights for all people regardless of gender" in The church allows but does not require pastors to perform same-sex weddings. The United Church of Canada , members was active in the campaign that led to legal recognition of same-sex marriages in Canada. The United Church now allows individual congregations to decide whether or not to perform these marriages. Some Christians support religious and legal recognition of same-sex marriages based on a moral commitment to equality, or a belief that "human sexual orientations, whether heterosexual, bisexual or homosexual, are a gift from God", as affirmed by the United Church of Canada's 37th General Council.

Even within the Roman Catholic Church, there can be found a few a groups who support for same-sex marriage. According to Daniel A. Helminiak , [37] the Bible may be interpreted literally or within historical-cultural context. Under a literalist reading, the Bible can be read as condemning homosexuality and, by extension, gay marriage. Jude condemns sex with angels , not sex between two men.

Not a single Bible text indisputably refers to lesbian sex. Biblical figures [ And Jesus himself said nothing at all about homosexuality, not even when face to face with a man in a gay relationship. The Bible was written for a world unlike our own. At the United States Unitarian Universalist General Assembly , delegates voted overwhelmingly that they would perform same-sex marriage ceremonies, and the church has been performing weddings with and without state sanction ever since.

There are both conservative and liberal views about homosexuality and same-sex marriages in Hinduism , similar to many other religions. A liberal view is presented by Mathematician Shakuntala Devi, in her book, The World of Homosexuals , in which she interviewed Srinivasa Raghavachariar, head priest of the Srirangam temple. He said that same-sex lovers must have been cross-sex lovers in a former life.

The sex may change but the soul retains its attachments, hence the love impels these souls towards one another. As Amara Das Wilhelm, a Krishna devotee and founder of GALVA, notes in his book, Tritiya-Prakriti: People of the Third Sex , "several Gaudiya Vaishnava authorities emphasize that since everyone passes through various forms, genders and species in a series of lives, we should not judge each other by the material body but view everyone equally on a spiritual plane, and be compassionate as God is.

Several weddings took place by Hindu rites, with some family support, while the suicides resulted from families forcibly separating lovers. The millennia-long debate in Hindu society, somewhat suppressed in the colonial period, has revived. In , Hinduism Today reporter Rajiv Malik asked several Hindu swamis teachers their opinion of same-sex marriage. They felt free to differ with each other; this is evidence of the liveliness of the debate, made possible by the fact that Hinduism has no one hierarchy or leader.

We have a hundred million authorities. Same sex marriage is not permissible in Islamic teachings. This is stated in a chapter named "Lut" in the Quran. In Albania , Tunisia , and Turkey , there have been discussions about legalizing same-sex marriage.

In France there was an Islamic same-sex marriage on February 18, A majority of American Muslims 51 percent support same-sex marriage as of , according to a survey by the Public Religion Research Institute in their " American Values Atlas. Members of Conservative Judaism [61] and Reform Judaism [62] support marriages for same-sex couples. The Jewish Reconstructionist Federation leaves the choice to individual rabbis. Native American religions traditionally accepted same-sex marriage.

Neopagans are generally welcoming of LGBT people, and some strands celebrate gay relationships. Support is highest in Neo-Druidism , Wicca and Asatru. Many supporters of same sex marriages argue [68] [69] that, by defining the institution of marriage as between one man and one woman, the state automatically tramples upon the constitutional rights to freedom of religion.

They argue that just because a majority of religious organizations may believe that gay marriages should not be granted by the state does not make it the state's obligation to observe their opinions on this matter. The First Amendment to the United States Constitution , which is part of the United States Bill of Rights , expressly forbids laws being made "respecting an establishment of religion" and that prohibit the free exercise of religion.

Americans United for Separation of Church and State prominently expresses concern that heterosexual-only marriage laws impose a specific religious doctrine as state policy. According to them, "a marriage amendment in the Constitution [raises] important church-state and religious liberty concerns. The vast majority of Christian groups have been vocal and politically active in opposing same-sex marriage laws in the United States.

Christian denominations and groups that have been vocal and or active in their opposition to same-sex marriages include the:. Assemblies of God In , a group of Christian leaders from various denominations issued the Manhattan Declaration , an "influential statement that united evangelicals and Catholic leaders in fighting abortion and gay marriage"; as of November , the Declaration had been signed by over , individuals.

The statement was signed by evangelical leaders, and includes 14 points of belief. The Roman Catholic Church argues from a theological perspective against recognizing same-sex unions. According to Catholic moral doctrine, acts of sexual intimacy are only proper between a man and a woman within wedlock. Secular government recognition of any other union within the definition of "marriage" would therefore reflect a belief in the moral equivalence of acts between a husband and wife and acts between two men or two women; this belief is contrary to Catholic doctrinal teaching.

Catholic opponents also argue that inclusion of same-sex unions within the definition of marriage would also evidence rejection of the idea that, in general, it is best that children be raised by their biological mother and father, and that it is the community's interest in ensuring the well-being of children is the sole basis for the government's licensee and involvement in marriage.

Pope John Paul II , then head of the Roman Catholic church, criticized same-sex marriage [] when it was introduced in the Netherlands in They all view same-sex marriage as a sin. This statement from the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America further explains: "The position of the Orthodox Church toward homosexual acts has been expressed by synodicals, canons and patristic pronouncements from the very first centuries of Orthodox ecclesiastical life.

In them, the Orthodox Church condemns unreservedly all expressions of personal sexual experience which prove contrary to the definite and unalterable function ascribed to sex by God's ordinance and expressed in man's experience as a law of nature. The Orthodox Church believes that homosexual behavior is a sin. Within the Christian tradition, religious objections to same-sex marriages are often based upon the Bible.

Some religious arguments against same-sex marriage are based upon Old Testament biblical passages such as Genesis , Leviticus , and Leviticus , [] [] [] [] while others are based upon New Testament biblical passages such as Romans 1, I Corinthians , and Jude While the Biblical passages mentioned above do not define the institution of marriage, Genesis reads as follows: "Then the Lord God made a woman from the rib he had taken out of the man, and he brought her to the man.

The man said, 'This is now bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called 'woman,' for she was taken out of man.

According to Reverend Rick Warren , a pastor of the conservative Evangelical Christian Saddleback megachurch , homosexuals are people who "think they are smarter than God" and who choose "to disobey God's sexual instructions.

The ex-gay movement takes the view that I Corinthians offers Christian believers freedom from the sin of homosexual behavior. The Orthodox Church in America [] is also opposed to same-sex marriage, as is the Unification Church.

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 15 million members believes that marriage between a man and a woman is ordained of God and that children are entitled to be raised by a mother and a father who honor their marital vows with complete fidelity. They teach that same-sex marriage undermines the purpose of marriage. Jehovah's Witnesses 8. They teach that while the bible condemns homosexual acts, it does not condone hatred of homosexuals or homophobia.

On February 26, , conference delegates voted against a proposal that would have begun allowing churches to set their own LGBT policies at a local level. Instead, the previous day, a majority of delegates indicated that they would support a stricter approach to the existing policies, including encouraging dissenters to leave the church.

Judaism, like Christianity, reflects differing views between conservative and liberal adherents. Orthodox Judaism maintains the traditional Jewish bans on both sexual acts and marriage amongst members of the same sex.

Traditional marriage is usually so fecund that those who would frustrate its end must do violence to nature to prevent the birth of children by using contraception. Why do adults need a judge's approval to be married, anyway? Joe Setyon 7. Masterpiece is the first such case to make it to the justices. Pros and cons in debate over origin of sexual orientation.

Reason for gay marriage

Reason for gay marriage

Reason for gay marriage

Reason for gay marriage

Reason for gay marriage. 2. It Violates Natural Law

Pro 6 Same-sex marriage is a civil right. Virginia that marriage is "one of the basic civil rights of man. Pro 7 Marriage is not only for procreation, otherwise infertile couples or couples not wishing to have children would be prevented from marrying.

Ability or desire to create offspring has never been a qualification for marriage. Pro 8 Gay marriages can bring financial gain to federal, state, and local governments and can help boost the economy.

Government revenue from marriage comes from marriage licenses, higher income taxes in some circumstances the so-called "marriage penalty" , and decreases in costs for state benefit programs. Pro 9 Gay couples make good parents. A June peer-reviewed University of Melbourne study showed that children raised by same-sex parents score about six percent higher than the general population on measures of general health and family cohesion.

Pro 10 Gay marriage bans cause humiliation and uncertainty for children being raised by same-sex couples. In ruling Texas' gay marriage ban unconstitutional, San Antonio-based federal judge Orlando Garcia stated that the ban "causes needless stigmatization and humiliation for children being raised by the loving same-sex couples being targeted. Pro 11 Marriage provides both physical and psychological health benefits, and banning gay marriage increases rates of psychological disorders.

A study published on Apr. Rather, anthropological research supports the conclusion that a vast array of family types, including families built upon same-sex partnerships, can contribute to stable and humane societies. Pro 13 Gay marriage legalization is correlated with lower divorce rates, while gay marriage bans are correlated with higher divorce rates. Massachusetts, which became the first US state to legalize gay marriage in , had the lowest divorce rate in the country in Alaska, which altered its constitution to prohibit gay marriage in , saw a The seven states with the highest divorce rates between and all had constitutional prohibitions to gay marriage.

Pro 14 Legal marriage is a secular institution that should not be limited by religious objections to same-sex marriage. Religious institutions can decline to marry gay and lesbian couples if they wish, but they should not dictate marriage laws for society at large. As explained by People for the American Way, "As a legal matter, marriage is a civil institution Marriage is also a religious institution, defined differently by different faiths and congregations.

In America, the distinction can get blurry because states permit clergy to carry out both religious and civil marriage in a single ceremony. Religious Right leaders have exploited that confusion by claiming that granting same-sex couples equal access to civil marriage would somehow also redefine the religious institution of marriage Schwarzenegger that "[c]ivil law has always been supreme in defining and regulating marriage.

Pro 15 Many religious leaders and churches support gay marriage and say it is consistent with scripture. And they [religious people] see that love in our families, and I think people can't help but be supportive. The United Church of Christ General Synod voted in July to affirm "equal marriage rights for couples regardless of gender. Con 1 The institution of marriage has traditionally been defined as being between a man and a woman.

Sutton wrote that "marriage has long been a social institution defined by relationships between men and women. So long defined, the tradition is measured in millennia, not centuries or decades. So widely shared, the tradition until recently had been adopted by all governments and major religions of the world.

Nelson, the Supreme Court of Minnesota found that "the institution of marriage as a union of man and woman, uniquely involving the procreation and rearing of children within a family, is as old as the book of Genesis. Harvey, MA, STL, late Catholic priest, wrote in July that "Throughout the history of the human race the institution of marriage has been understood as the complete spiritual and bodily communion of one man and one woman. Con 2 Marriage is for procreation and should not be extended to same-sex couples because they cannot produce children together.

Allowing gay marriage would only further shift the purpose of marriage from producing and raising children to adult gratification. Same-sex couples can never provide a child with both her biological mother and her biological father. Seemingly infertile heterosexual couples sometimes produce children, and medical advances may allow others to procreate in the future.

Heterosexual couples who do not wish to have children are still biologically capable of having them, and may change their minds.

Con 3 Children need both a mother and a father. Girls who are raised apart from their fathers are reportedly at higher risk for early sexual activity and teenage pregnancy. I don't want to see children being engineered for same-sex couples where there is either a mom missing or a dad missing.

Dobson, Founder and Chairman of Focus on the Family, predicted in that legalizing same-sex marriage will enable "group marriage," "marriage between daddies and little girls," and "marriage between a man and his donkey. Con 5 Allowing gay couples to wed could further weaken the institution of marriage. Anderson, William E. Redefining marriage to include same-sex relationships is the culmination of this revisionism, and it would leave emotional intensity as the only thing that sets marriage apart from other bonds.

Con 6 Homosexuality is immoral and unnatural. Matt Barber, Associate Dean for Online Programs at Liberty University School of Law, stated that "Every individual engaged in the homosexual lifestyle, who has adopted a homosexual identity, they know, intuitively, that what they're doing is immoral, unnatural, and self-destructive, yet they thirst for that affirmation.

Marriage is holy, while homosexual acts go against the natural moral law. Con 7 Gay marriage is contrary to the word of God and is incompatible with the beliefs, sacred texts, and traditions of many religious groups.

The Bible, in Leviticus , states: "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination," thus condemning homosexual relationships. No ideology can erase from the human spirit the certainty that marriage exists solely between a man and a woman…" [ 54 ] Pope Benedict stated in Jan. Maryland ended health insurance benefits for new domestic partnerships after same-sex marriage became legal in the state in Con 9 Gay marriage will accelerate the assimilation of gays into mainstream heterosexual culture to the detriment of the homosexual community.

The gay community has created its own vibrant culture. By reducing the differences in opportunities and experiences between gay and heterosexual people, this unique culture may cease to exist. Lesbian activist M. Lee Badgett, PhD, Director of the Center for Public Policy and Administration at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, stated that for many gay activists "marriage means adopting heterosexual forms of family and giving up distinctively gay family forms and perhaps even gay and lesbian culture.

Con 10 Marriage is an outmoded, oppressive institution that should be weakened, not expanded. There are various reasons while people oppose same-sex marriage, but a common argument of opponents is that the alteration of the traditional views on marriage may weaken the institution and lead to polygamy and even interspecies marriages. While many think that this has always been defined as one man and one woman, this is a historically inaccurate misconception.

From a purely biological standpoint, heterosexual monogamy can be seen as unnatural when we consider the common occurrence of polyamorous societies, concubines, communal child-rearing and the like throughout history and evolution.

Our society allows people who barely know each other to get married and separate only a few months later. Building on the previous item, the concept of marriage is constantly redefined, just as society evolves and grows. In the past, many cases of marriages were harmful to the various constituents involved at times to the extent of being non-consensual like in arranged marriages and yet their respective societies recognized them.

Many Americans now support same-sex marriage as compared to the sentiment of the past, which ostracized various cultures for their unconventionality.

Until , interracial marriage was also still illegal in several US states. In , no-fault divorce was introduced on January 1 in California, and has dynamically affected the institution of marriage.

These are just a few examples of how marriage and other institutions of society adapt and change over time. It would be backward to think that one definition can remain relevant for all time, especially given that change is the only constant in our dynamic world.

Same sex couples have the right to the very same benefits that heterosexual or non-LGBT couples enjoy, as they are citizens of the same place. If a city allows its citizens to get married, why should a legal citizen be excluded from the same right simply because of their sexual identification? This is especially true because the American Constitution is committed to liberty and equality for its citizens.

To promote anti-gay marriage sentiments as well as the banning of same-sex marriage are unconstitutional actions. In the United States, only 25 states as well as the District of Columbia have legalized same-sex marriage to date. The remaining 25 currently declare gay marriage as illegal, or incorporate various forms of bans in their laws or constitutional amendments.

Those in favor of gay marriage argue that these couples have a right to the benefits and recognition that heterosexual couples receive, as they are people with individual rights and citizens of the same country. By the prohibition of same-sex marriage, lawmakers discriminate against the LGBT community, violating their human rights. When you prevent same sex couples from marrying, it sends out the message that discriminating against others because of their sexual orientation is okay.

It tells other citizens that it is okay to judge other people and base your actions upon these quick judgments, even when you only know one aspect of their life, like sexual orientation. People in the LGBT community experience startlingly high levels of discrimination in school, at work, and fighting for marriage equality is one step closer to the equal rights that marks a civil, humane society.

Did you know that in the United States alone, approximately , children wait hopefully for the day when they would be adopted? How often do we hear about the failings of our system and the numerous orphans or children in adoption centers who fall through the cracks?

If children are indeed our future, should we not look for loving and supportive parents for each child left waiting for adoption?

Legalizing same sex marriage would facilitate the adoption of these LGBT couples, allowing for stable homes for kids who heretofore had none.

Those who oppose LGBT and same sex marriage would argue that gay parents will result in difficulties for the child, but this has proven to be untrue.

This argument rests on the assumption that same sex parents will inherently cause problems for the kids they adopt, and have a much higher chance of being poor parents than heterosexual couples. If you examine that assumption, one can easily find very poor foundations. A similar study published in July of the same year showed that children with gay fathers were as well-adjusted as their counterparts.

Quite often the children left in foster care and in state homes long for the love and presence of good parents. Gay couples long to shower their love and leave a legacy in the form of kids. In fact, if we legalize marriage between same sex couples, it will be much easier to monitor the care of the children, just like Child Protective Services can monitor and possibly intervene in cases of heterosexual marriages.

Also, when the children see that their parents union is recognized, they will benefit greatly and the possible discrimination and stigma can be alleviated. As legal citizens whose rights are recognized, we receive a significant amount of social support.

In many countries, no government or social system is perfect, but having at least the basic rights recognized can mean a great deal.

Ten Arguments From Social Science Against Same-Sex Marriage

Prior to their decision, same-sex marriage was already legal in 37 states and Washington DC, but was banned in the remaining Proponents of legal gay marriage contend that gay marriage bans are discriminatory and unconstitutional, and that same-sex couples should have access to all the benefits enjoyed by different-sex couples. Opponents contend that marriage has traditionally been defined as being between one man and one woman, and that marriage is primarily for procreation.

Did You Know? On May 17, , the first legal gay marriage in the United States was performed in Cambridge, MA between Tanya McCloskey, a massage therapist, and Marcia Kadish, an employment manager at an engineering firm. The world's first legal gay marriage ceremony took place in the Netherlands on Apr. The four couples, one female and three male, were married in a televised ceremony officiated by the mayor of Amsterdam. The Congressional Budget Office estimated on Dec.

An Oct. Proper citation depends on your preferred or required style manual. Here are the proper bibliographic citations for this page according to four style manuals in alphabetical order :. Skip to content. Gay Marriage. Should Gay Marriage Be Legal? On July 25, Miami-Dade County Circuit Court Judge Sarah Zabel ruled Florida's gay marriage ban unconstitutional and stated that the ban "serves only to hurt, to discriminate, to deprive same-sex couples and their families of equal dignity, to label and treat them as second-class citizens, and to deem them unworthy of participation in one of the fundamental institutions of our society.

We have joined together to recognize equality for racial minorities, women, people with disabilities, immigrants As explained by David S. Nancy, a woman, can marry Tom, but Bill, a man, cannot Nancy can do something marry Tom that Bill cannot, simply because Nancy is a woman and Bill is a man.

Pro 2 Same-sex couples should have access to the same benefits enjoyed by heterosexual married couples. There are 1, benefits, rights and protections available to married couples in federal law alone, according to a General Accounting Office assessment made in Harvard University historian Nancy F. Cott stated that until two centuries ago, "monogamous households were a tiny, tiny portion" of the world's population, and were found only in "Western Europe and little settlements in North America.

LaFleur that the "freedom of personal choice in matters of marriage and family life is one of the liberties protected by the Due Process Clause. Pro 5 Marriage is an internationally recognized human right for all people. Since the US Supreme Court has declared 14 times that marriage is a fundamental right for all, according to the American Foundation for Equal Rights. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.

Non-discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation has therefore become an internationally recognized principle. Pro 6 Same-sex marriage is a civil right. Virginia that marriage is "one of the basic civil rights of man. Pro 7 Marriage is not only for procreation, otherwise infertile couples or couples not wishing to have children would be prevented from marrying.

Ability or desire to create offspring has never been a qualification for marriage. Pro 8 Gay marriages can bring financial gain to federal, state, and local governments and can help boost the economy. Government revenue from marriage comes from marriage licenses, higher income taxes in some circumstances the so-called "marriage penalty" , and decreases in costs for state benefit programs.

Pro 9 Gay couples make good parents. A June peer-reviewed University of Melbourne study showed that children raised by same-sex parents score about six percent higher than the general population on measures of general health and family cohesion.

Pro 10 Gay marriage bans cause humiliation and uncertainty for children being raised by same-sex couples. In ruling Texas' gay marriage ban unconstitutional, San Antonio-based federal judge Orlando Garcia stated that the ban "causes needless stigmatization and humiliation for children being raised by the loving same-sex couples being targeted.

Pro 11 Marriage provides both physical and psychological health benefits, and banning gay marriage increases rates of psychological disorders. A study published on Apr. Rather, anthropological research supports the conclusion that a vast array of family types, including families built upon same-sex partnerships, can contribute to stable and humane societies.

Pro 13 Gay marriage legalization is correlated with lower divorce rates, while gay marriage bans are correlated with higher divorce rates. Massachusetts, which became the first US state to legalize gay marriage in , had the lowest divorce rate in the country in Alaska, which altered its constitution to prohibit gay marriage in , saw a The seven states with the highest divorce rates between and all had constitutional prohibitions to gay marriage. Pro 14 Legal marriage is a secular institution that should not be limited by religious objections to same-sex marriage.

Religious institutions can decline to marry gay and lesbian couples if they wish, but they should not dictate marriage laws for society at large. As explained by People for the American Way, "As a legal matter, marriage is a civil institution Marriage is also a religious institution, defined differently by different faiths and congregations. In America, the distinction can get blurry because states permit clergy to carry out both religious and civil marriage in a single ceremony.

Religious Right leaders have exploited that confusion by claiming that granting same-sex couples equal access to civil marriage would somehow also redefine the religious institution of marriage Schwarzenegger that "[c]ivil law has always been supreme in defining and regulating marriage. Pro 15 Many religious leaders and churches support gay marriage and say it is consistent with scripture. And they [religious people] see that love in our families, and I think people can't help but be supportive.

The United Church of Christ General Synod voted in July to affirm "equal marriage rights for couples regardless of gender. Con 1 The institution of marriage has traditionally been defined as being between a man and a woman. Sutton wrote that "marriage has long been a social institution defined by relationships between men and women.

So long defined, the tradition is measured in millennia, not centuries or decades. So widely shared, the tradition until recently had been adopted by all governments and major religions of the world. Nelson, the Supreme Court of Minnesota found that "the institution of marriage as a union of man and woman, uniquely involving the procreation and rearing of children within a family, is as old as the book of Genesis.

Harvey, MA, STL, late Catholic priest, wrote in July that "Throughout the history of the human race the institution of marriage has been understood as the complete spiritual and bodily communion of one man and one woman.

Con 2 Marriage is for procreation and should not be extended to same-sex couples because they cannot produce children together. Allowing gay marriage would only further shift the purpose of marriage from producing and raising children to adult gratification.

Same-sex couples can never provide a child with both her biological mother and her biological father. Seemingly infertile heterosexual couples sometimes produce children, and medical advances may allow others to procreate in the future.

Heterosexual couples who do not wish to have children are still biologically capable of having them, and may change their minds. Con 3 Children need both a mother and a father. Girls who are raised apart from their fathers are reportedly at higher risk for early sexual activity and teenage pregnancy.

I don't want to see children being engineered for same-sex couples where there is either a mom missing or a dad missing. Dobson, Founder and Chairman of Focus on the Family, predicted in that legalizing same-sex marriage will enable "group marriage," "marriage between daddies and little girls," and "marriage between a man and his donkey. Con 5 Allowing gay couples to wed could further weaken the institution of marriage. Anderson, William E. Redefining marriage to include same-sex relationships is the culmination of this revisionism, and it would leave emotional intensity as the only thing that sets marriage apart from other bonds.

Con 6 Homosexuality is immoral and unnatural. Matt Barber, Associate Dean for Online Programs at Liberty University School of Law, stated that "Every individual engaged in the homosexual lifestyle, who has adopted a homosexual identity, they know, intuitively, that what they're doing is immoral, unnatural, and self-destructive, yet they thirst for that affirmation.

Marriage is holy, while homosexual acts go against the natural moral law. Con 7 Gay marriage is contrary to the word of God and is incompatible with the beliefs, sacred texts, and traditions of many religious groups. The Bible, in Leviticus , states: "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination," thus condemning homosexual relationships.

No ideology can erase from the human spirit the certainty that marriage exists solely between a man and a woman…" [ 54 ] Pope Benedict stated in Jan. Maryland ended health insurance benefits for new domestic partnerships after same-sex marriage became legal in the state in Con 9 Gay marriage will accelerate the assimilation of gays into mainstream heterosexual culture to the detriment of the homosexual community.

The gay community has created its own vibrant culture. By reducing the differences in opportunities and experiences between gay and heterosexual people, this unique culture may cease to exist. Lesbian activist M. Lee Badgett, PhD, Director of the Center for Public Policy and Administration at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, stated that for many gay activists "marriage means adopting heterosexual forms of family and giving up distinctively gay family forms and perhaps even gay and lesbian culture.

Con 10 Marriage is an outmoded, oppressive institution that should be weakened, not expanded. LGBT lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender activist collective Against Equality states that "Gay marriage apes hetero privilege The family is the microcosm of oppression. Con 11 People should not have their tax dollars used to support something they believe is wrong. Peter S. Sprigg, MDiv, Senior Fellow for Policy Studies at the Family Research Council, said that if gay marriage were legalized, "[t]axpayers, consumers, and businesses would be forced to subsidize homosexual relationships One of the key arguments often heard in support of homosexual civil marriage revolves around all the government 'benefits' that homosexuals claim they are denied.

Many of these 'benefits' involve one thing—taxpayer money that homosexuals are eager to get their hands on. On Dec. Con 12 Marriage is a privilege, not a right. The US Constitution contains no explicit right to marry. The Illinois Family Institute states that if gay marriage is legalized, "Children will be taught that homosexuality is morally equivalent to heterosexuality They will be taught that opposition to both was motivated by ignorance and hatred.

To be brainwashed to think that homosexuality is the moral equivalent of heterosexuality.

Reason for gay marriage

Reason for gay marriage